fbpx Skip to main content

Work From Home: The Debate So Far

The debate surrounding work-from-home, hybrid working models, and traditional office-based workforces has become a recurring theme in the wake of the global pandemic, with differing preferences and opinions emerging between employers and employees.

The pandemic acted as a catalyst for a shift towards remote working. This shift, initially intended as a temporary provision, sparked a reevaluation of work norms and practices.

This debate is especially relevant to the IT and SAP services industry, where technology now allows for a greater degree of flexibility in terms of location, especially in light of the expected industry-wide migration to cloud services.

Initially, many companies in the IT and SAP services industry, accepted the change as a necessary for business continuity. However, as the world gradually adapted to the new normal, these organizations needed to decide whether to continue with remote work, adopt a hybrid model, or revert to a fully office-based workforce.

This week IgniteSAP will discuss the current controversy around work arrangements, focusing on the SAP services sector. We will look at the issue to establish the current state of affairs, but also offer a deeper look into the future development of work culture in these industries.

Technological Enablement in SAP Services

SAP consultants, who traditionally operated in an office or on client sites, found themselves in a landscape where remote work was not just possible but often more efficient. The cloud infrastructure inherent in modern SAP services allowed these professionals to access, manage, and deliver critical services from virtually anywhere. This shift represented a fundamental change in how IT services were conceptualized and delivered.

Despite the technological enablement, a significant portion of roles in the SAP services industry remain client-facing. The nature of client interactions, which often rely on building trust and understanding customer needs, posed questions about the effectiveness of remote engagements. The challenge was to balance the technological possibilities of remote work with the human-centric approach that is central to client-facing roles.

Benefits of In-Office Work

The benefits of in-office work include better opportunities for collaboration, mentoring, and building a cohesive organizational culture. Physical proximity facilitates quicker problem-solving and decision-making processes and helps in forming strong professional relationships, with related reinforcement of communication and motivation. Being in a shared space can create a sense of community and belonging, which can also encourage employee engagement and retention, but these benefits still are dependent on satisfying the individual needs and preferences of the employee.

Factors Influencing Work Arrangements

Many tasks requiring deep concentration can benefit from the quiet and controlled environment of home offices. Conversely, activities that rely heavily on team collaboration and client interaction might suffer in a fully remote setup, despite provision in software for remote access and tools for collaboration like video conferencing.

The impact on employee well-being and work-life balance is a crucial consideration. Remote work has been shown to offer greater flexibility, which can lead to improved job satisfaction and mental health. However, without carefully defined boundaries it also blurs the lines between personal and professional life, sometimes leading to longer working hours and increased stress.

The cultural and structural readiness of a company to support remote work is another consideration. This includes the technological infrastructure and the managerial and organizational mindset. Companies in the IT and SAP services sectors have had to reassess their policies, communication strategies, and performance evaluation metrics to adapt to a remote or hybrid workforce effectively.

The preferences of employees themselves are a significant factor. The pandemic has given many workers a taste of the benefits of remote work, changing their expectations and desires for future work arrangements. This is particularly relevant in SAP services where a significant portion of the total workforce changes employers each year.

Initial Return-to-Office Attempts

Initial efforts to bring workers back to the office varied in approach and intensity. One notable trend during this phase was the increasing firmness of employers regarding in-office work. After a period accommodating the necessity of working from home, and employee preferences for remote work, many companies started to mandate minimum in-office days. This policy adjustment was driven by multiple factors, including the need to drive team collaboration, maintain company culture, and enhance client engagement, all of which benefit from in-person interactions.

In September 2023 IBM stated in an internal blog that “all IBM Software employees will be required to spend at least 3 days in the office each week” regardless of their work arrangement. This applied to the whole of IBM’s global software division (exempting those with medical issues, military service, or employees who lived further than 50 miles from their office). They did not specify whether failure to meet requirements would result in disciplinary action, but added that managers who were unable to attend three days per week “must separate from IBM”. Among the reasons given for the change in policy, IBM said:

“It is vital to our culture and our shared goals: tripling development output, building winning products, and winning new clients, that we spend more meaningful time together, in-person.”

The Hardening Policies of Employers

The physical office is seen as a symbol of stability and normalcy, important for both client perception and employee morale.

While acknowledging the benefits of remote work, the majority of companies appear keen to ensure they have an office-based workforce, for at least part of the working week. A survey conducted by Resumebuilder recently revealed that a significant 90% of businesses are considering discontinuing remote work by the close of 2024. Nearly a quarter of these companies are contemplating termination for those not complying with the change. In contrast, a different study by Envoy highlighted that 80% of senior leaders have reservations about their initial decisions to recall employees to the office.

Some companies are concerned about maintaining control and oversight, which can be more challenging with a fully remote workforce. There’s also an underlying belief that in-person work environments can lead to more efficient knowledge transfer, especially for new employees or those in training.

Employers prefer to be able to monitor the work carried out by their workforce in an office environment because they have to validate their investment in those workers, particularly when they are charging their clients for services carried out by those employees, and therefore need to justify the value of their services based on the billable hours and quality of service delivered.

Employees in general suggest that this need to monitor workers and their productivity indicates a lack of trust, and that they should be allowed to work in any way that suits their own requirements, as long as they deliver projects on time and within budget.

Along with many other corporations like Apple, Amazon and Microsoft, SAP has faced internal resistance. Its new policy requiring employees globally to work in an office or on-site with a customer three days a week (starting from April 2024) led to over 5,000 signatures of discontent from employees, with some threatening to seek alternative employment rather than comply with the back-to-office mandate.

Adjustments To Initial Return-To-Office Strategies

Several companies, especially in the IT and SAP services industries, have expressed regrets over their initial strategies.

A leading firm known for its strict in-office attendance policy, later acknowledged that this approach may have been too abrupt. The company’s leadership decided that a more gradual and empathetic strategy, considering employee feedback and well-being, would have been more effective in ensuring a smooth transition.

An SAP services company, which had initially required a full return to the office, later realized that remote work did not significantly hamper their productivity or client relationships, contrary to their initial assumptions. This led to a revised policy that incorporated more remote work options.

These attempts to address the issue of whether home, office or hybrid working was best for companies or employees were likely based on data from workforce analytics and financial reports, but the problem is essentially unresolved because a lack of transparency on how these policy decisions were made, and a lack of consensus around which working model is best for both parties.

All stakeholders in this debate need information which can prove conclusively in each case and context what is the best compromise: and due to the unprecedented nature of the events which led to this current state of affairs, research on the advantages and disadvantages of each work scenario for employer and employee is still emerging.

Balancing Employee Preferences And Business Needs

Hardening stances on returning to work have strained employee relations and, in some cases, led to talent attrition. Inflexible policies sometimes resulted in losing valuable employees who sought more accommodating work environments. Recognizing this, several firms in the SAP services industry have started to recalibrate their policies for a better balance.

Companies in the IT and SAP services industries are now incorporating employee feedback into their revised return-to-office strategies: conducting regular surveys and feedback sessions to understand employee preferences, offering flexible work arrangements like hybrid models and remote options, and customizing team-based approaches.

Enhanced communication channels, such as virtual meetings and open forums, are being used to maintain open dialogue. There is also a focus on health and wellness programs, revising performance metrics to suit flexible working environments, and involving employees in policy development.

These policy adjustments highlight a developing understanding within the industry that the future of work is not a one-size-fits-all model but a fluid concept that requires continuous reassessment and adaptation.

Encouraging The Return To The Office

Hybrid work models are being offered as a compromise, ensuring both flexibility and in-person collaboration. In practice this still requires employees to be physically present for some of the working week, and opinions vary on how many days attendance per week.

Corporations are redesigning office spaces to be more appealing, with collaborative and relaxation areas, along with advanced technology setups. Incentives such as free meals, transportation allowances, and financial bonuses are also being provided to motivate in-office attendance. To enhance team dynamics and networking, companies are also organizing more in-person team-building events and activities.

EY’s return to the office program was well received among their US employees. Frank Giampietro, the Chief Wellbeing Officer at EY, stated, “In response to 50% of our workforce highlighting issues related to pet care, childcare, and commuting, we decided to eliminate these obstacles.”

At the start of this year, the company launched the “EY way of working transition fund.” This initiative includes full coverage of commuting expenses, all dependent care costs, and pet care expenses for its US employees, and so facilitates their office attendance. This benefit is available to all of their over 55,000 US staff members, who can seek unlimited reimbursements for these costs. The initiative required $22 million in funding and the cost-effectiveness of such solutions remains to be seen.

Hybrid models are generally appreciated, offering a balance between flexibility and in-person collaboration, but still require negotiation regarding how much time is spent in the office. The overall success of these initiatives depends on how well they align with each employee’s needs and preferences, as well as the evolving nature of work in the SAP services industry.

Over time, and with sufficient data covering various working scenarios, the best compromise in each case will become apparent.

Employee Productivity In The Hybrid Workforce

Recent academic research is now providing insights on the impact of changing work arrangements on both business goals and employee satisfaction. These studies convey the complexity of understanding the effectiveness of remote workforces, and it will be some time before these issues are at least partially resolved.

One study indicates that working entirely remotely can be up to 10% less effective compared to being on-site. Yet remote work offers substantial cost savings by reducing the necessity for office space and allowing for a more geographically diverse talent pool, potentially raising the quality of the workforce.

On balance, hybrid work appears to have a neutral impact on overall productivity and, in some cases, may even enhance it. Additionally, hybrid work models offer savings for both sides in terms of both time and money by reducing commuting. If employees can achieve their work goals in a hybrid setting, whether they travel to the office two days or four days a week, they are effectively utilizing their time more efficiently.

Business Goals and Employee Satisfaction

Harvard Business School have shown that work-from-home and hybrid models can positively impact employee satisfaction, primarily due to the flexibility they offer. This flexibility often leads to an improved work-life balance, which can enhance job satisfaction, reduce burnout rates, and employee attrition rates.

The direct impact on business goals is more of a grey area. Research indicates that remote work can be highly effective for information-based tasks (like SAP consulting) and roles with clear, independent deliverables. However, for roles that require high levels of collaboration, creativity, and innovation (also like SAP consulting), the lack of face-to-face interaction can be a significant barrier.

The New Balance

There is a noticeable divergence in preferences between companies and their employees regarding work arrangements. While employees tend to favor the flexibility of remote or hybrid models, many companies still emphasize the need for in-office presence.

The most effective approach may lie in a tailored balance according to context, where the specific needs of both the business and the employees are considered, and individual agreements are established during candidacy and onboarding.

In sectors like the SAP services industry, the future of consulting may well be defined by how these divergent preferences are reconciled and how organizations adapt to the evolving landscape of work preferences and requirements. The inherent influence of technology in these sectors will also necessitate constant review.

As companies navigate this complex area, and more studies are carried out in a variety of working contexts, a body of academic research will build up, leading to some consensus and standard practices, but what is clear is that these standard practices will change over time.

While the controversy rumbles on, future of work in SAP services appears to be heading towards a model that values flexibility and employee well-being while recognizing the benefits of in-person collaboration, leading to the proliferation of the hybrid employment model.

The key will be in how companies adapt to the ongoing changes in employee expectations and technological advancements. The optimal work environment in the SAP services industry is likely to be one that is fluid, responsive, and tailored to the needs of both the business and its employees.

Companies must also take into account the current high demand for SAP consulting talent and adjust their demands accordingly in order to maintain a stable and productive workforce.

If you are an SAP professional looking for a new role in the SAP ecosystem our team of dedicated recruitment consultants can match you with your ideal employer and negotiate a competitive compensation package for your extremely valuable skills, so join our exclusive community at IgniteSAP.